4.1 Article

No support for association between the dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene and ADHD

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30206

关键词

dopamine transporter (DAT1); medication response; haplotype; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); promoter polymorphism

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G9810900] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G9810900] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G9810900] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several groups have reported an association between the 10-repeat allele of a dopamine transporter (DAT1) 3'UTR VNTR variant and ADHD but the finding has not been universally observed. An association between DAT1 genotype and stimulant medication response has also been reported although again there are conflicting data. We tested the DAT1 3'VNTR and three SNPs in the putative promoter region of DAT1 for association with ADHD in 263 parent-proband trios. Analyses of genotypes, alleles, and haplotypes were performed using family-based association methods. Case-control analysis of the VNTR in 263 cases and 287 controls was also conducted. In addition, we tested for association between the VNTR marker and stimulant medication response. Comparing allele 10 versus all other alleles combined, no significant association was found with ADHD, using FBAT analysis (x(2) = 0.1 (df 1), P = 0.9, (odds ratio (OR) = 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.2), and case-control analysis (x(2) = 0.12 (df 2), P = 0.91). No evidence of association with any of the SNPs in the promoter region was found. Haplotype analysis was also non-significant (x(2) =3.93, (df 9) global P=0.85). Finally, no association was found between the DAT 1 VNTR and response to stimulant medication (x(2) = 1.63 (df 3) P = 0.65). We conclude that the 3' VNTR and three additional promoter variants in DAT1 do not appear to be associated with ADHD, or response to stimulant mediation in our sample. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据