4.5 Review Book Chapter

Stress and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update on Current Knowledge

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 34
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 337-+

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114452

关键词

work stress; social isolation; emotional triggering; coronary heart disease; hypertension

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [RG/10/005/28296] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K013351/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL036310] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIA NIH HHS [R01AG034454] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL036310] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG034454] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/J023299/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. ESRC [ES/J023299/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. MRC [MR/K013351/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considerable progress has been made during the past decade in research on cardiovascular effects of stress. Early-life stressors, such as childhood abuse and early socioeconomic adversity, are linked to increased cardiovascular morbidity in adulthood. Our updated meta-analyses of prospective studies published until 2011 show a 1.5-fold (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.9) increased risk of coronary heart disease among adults experiencing social isolation and a 1.3-fold (1.2-1.5) excess risk for workplace stress; adverse metabolic changes are one of the underlying plausible mechanisms. Stress, anger, and depressed mood can act as acute triggers of major cardiac events; the pooled relative risk of acute coronary syndrome onset being preceded by stress is 2.5 (1.8-3.5) in case-crossover studies. Stress is also implicated in the prognosis of cardiovascular disease and in the development of stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. A major challenge over the next decade is to incorporate stress processes into the mainstream of cardiovascular pathophysiological research and understanding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据