4.7 Article

Generalized Rayleigh criterion for non-axisymmetric centrifugal instabilities

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 542, 期 -, 页码 365-379

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112005006464

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The well-known Rayleigh criterion is a necessary and sufficient condition for inviscid centrifugal instability of axisymmetric perturbations. We have generalized this criterion to disturbances of any azimuthal wavenumber m by means of large-axial-wavenumber WKB asymptotics. A sufficient condition for a free axisymmetric vortex with angular velocity Omega(r) to be unstable to a three-dimensional perturbation of azimuthal wavenumber m is that the real part of the growth rate sigma(r) = -im Omega(r) + root-phi(r) is positive at the complex radius r = r(0) where theta sigma(r)/theta r = 0, i.e. phi'(r(0)) = -2im Omega'(r(0))root-phi(r(0)) where phi = (1/r(3)) theta r(4)Omega(2)/theta r is the Rayleigh discriminant, provided that some a posteriori checks are satisfied. The application of this new criterion to various classes of vortex profiles shows that the growth rate of non-axisymmetric disturbances decreases as m increases until a cutoff is reached. The criterion is in excellent agreement with numerical stability analyses of the Carton & McWilliams (1989) vortices and allows one to analyse the competition between the centrifugal instability and the shear instability. The generalized criterion is also valid for a vertical vortex in a stably stratified and rotating fluid, except that phi becomes phi = (1/r(3))theta r(4)(Omega + Omega b)(2)/theta r, where Omega(b) is the background rotation about the vertical axis. The stratification is found to have no effect. For the Taylor-Couette flow between two coaxial cylinders, the same criterion applies except that r(0) is real and equal to the inner cylinder radius. In sharp contrast, the maximum growth rate of non-axisymmetric disturbances is then independent of m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据