期刊
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 53-85出版社
ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633
关键词
choice; preference; inference; cognition; emotion; attention; memory; learning; process models
资金
- Russell Sage Foundation
- National Science Foundation [SES-0352062]
- National Institute of Aging [R01AGO27931-01A2]
A hill range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and learning, decision research over the past 10 years has also examined the effects of goals, mental representation, and memory processes. In addition to deliberative processes, automatic processes have gotten closer attention, and the emotions revolution has put affective processes on a footing equal to cognitive ones. Psychological process models provide natural predictions about individual differences and Hespan changes and integrate across judgment and decision making (JDM) phenomena. Mindful JDM research leverages our knowledge about psychological processes into causal explanations for important judgment and choice regularities, emphasizing the adaptive use of an abundance of processing alternatives. Such explanations supplement and support existing mathematical descriptions of phenomena such as loss aversion or hyperbolic discounting. Unlike such descriptions, they. also provide entry points for interventions designed to help people overcome judgments or choices considered undesirable.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据