4.7 Article

In vitro prevention of cyclosporin-induced cell contraction by mycophenolic acid

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 77, 期 26, 页码 3366-3374

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.05.050

关键词

cyclosporin; mycophenolic acid; vasoconstriction; transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nephrotoxicity is a major side-effect of cyclosporin A (CsA), which induces a vasoconstrictive response in vascular smooth muscle and mesangial cells. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is used in combination with low-dose CsA to reduce nephrotoxicity. We previously demonstrated that MPA affected mesangial cell contractile response to angiotensin II or KCl. Aims of the present study were to evaluate if MPA can prevent CsA-induced contraction of human mesangial and aortic smooth muscle cells (ASMC). Using a morphoquantitative approach, we evidenced that pretreatment with MPA (1 mu M) prevented the reduction of cell area induced by CsA within 30 min in both cell types. We then compared the expression of three main cytoskeleton. proteins: tubulin, alpha-smooth actin (SMA) and basic calponin, in ASMC and in mesangial cells treated with MPA and/or CsA. CsA alone did not significantly change the expression level of these proteins neither in mesangial cells nor in ASMC. MPA decreased the expression level of tubulin in both mesangial cells and ASMC. Surprisingly, MPA, which stimulated SMA and calponin expression in mesangial cells, exerted an inhibitory effect on both contractile protein expression in ASMC. In conclusion, our results evidenced opposite effects of MPA on calponin and SMA protein expression in ASMC and in mesangial cells, despite similar antiproliferative properties, suggesting that sarcomeric protein expression is controlled by different intracellular mechanisms in mesangial and smooth muscle cells. However, MPA interferes in both cell types with the constrictive properties CsA, which may partially explain the protective effects of MPA against CsA nephrotoxicity. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据