4.7 Article

Synthesis and thermo-responsive behavior of fluorescent labeled microgel particles based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and its related polymers

期刊

POLYMER
卷 46, 期 23, 页码 10027-10034

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.050

关键词

poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); microgel particle; fluorescent labeled hydrogel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) microgel particles labeled with 3-(2-propenyl)-9-(4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)phenanthrene (VDP) as an intramolecular fluorescent probe were prepared by emulsion polymerization. The thermo-responsive behavior of the VDP-labeled PNIPAM microgel particles dispersed in water was studied by turbidimetric and fluorescence analyses. The transition temperature of the VDP-labeled PNIPAM microgel particles in water determined by turbidimetric analysis was ca. 32.5 degrees C. The wavelength at the maximum fluorescence intensity of the VDP units linked directly to the microgel particles dramatically blue-shifted around the transition temperature. In addition it gradually blue-shifted even below the transition temperature where there was no change observed in the turbidity. These findings suggest that the gradual shrinking of microgel particles occurs with increasing temperature and the subsequent dramatic shrinking results in the increasing in the turbidity. The transition temperatures of VDP-labeled poly(N-n-propylacrylamide) and poly(N-isopropylmethacrylamide) microgel particles determined by turbidimetric analysis were ca. 23 and ca. 42.5 degrees C, respectively, and their thermo-responsive behavior was similar to that for the VDP-labeled PNIPAM system. In these three systems the microenvironments around the fluorescent probes above the transition temperatures became more hydrophobic than those below the transition temperature, and the estimated values of microenvionmental polarity around the VDP units on their collapsed states were almost the same. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据