4.7 Article

A quantitative analysis of lymphatic vessels in human breast cancer, based on LYVE-1 immunoreactivity

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 93, 期 10, 页码 1168-1174

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602844

关键词

breast cancer; lymphangiogenesis; lymphatic microvessel density; lymphatic vessel invasion; lymphatic tumour dissemination; LYVE-1

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was undertaken to determine the highly sensitive method for detecting tumour lymphatic vessels in all the fields of each slide (LV), lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD) and lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) and to compare them with other prognostic parameters using immunohistochemical staining with polyclonal (PCAB) and monoclonal antibodies (MCAB) to the lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1), and the pan-endothelial marker factorVIII in a series of 67 human breast cancers. In all LYVE-1-stained sections, LV (some of which contained red blood cells) were frequently found localised in extralobular stroma, dermis, connective tissue stroma and adjacent to artery and vein, but were rare within the intralobular stroma or the tumour body (3/67 cases) or areas of widespread invasion. In contrast small blood vessels were observed in intra- and extralobular stroma in the factor VIII-stained sections. Quantitation of vessel numbers revealed that LYVE-1/PCAB detected a significantly larger number of LV than either H&E or LYVE-1/MCAB (P<0.0001). LYVE-1/PCAB detected LVI in 25/67 cases (37.3%) and their presence was significantly associated with both lymph node metastasis (chi(2) = 4.698, P = 0.0248) and unfavourable overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0453), while not relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.2948). LMVD had no influence for RFS and OS (P = 0.4879, P = 0.1463, respectively). Our study demonstrates that immunohistochemistry with LYVE-1/PCAB is a highly sensitive method for detecting tumour LV/LVI in breast cancer and LVI is a useful prognostic indicator for lymphatic tumour dissemination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据