4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

δ13C tracing of dissolved inorganic carbon sources in Patagonian rivers (Argentina)

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 19, 期 17, 页码 3321-3344

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5973

关键词

dissolved inorganic carbon; flux; Patagonia; river; isotopic signature; tracing; dissolved organic carbon; strontium isotopes; rock weathering; atmospheric CO2; biospheric CO2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main Patagonian rivers (Colorado, Negro, Chubut, Deseado, Coyle, Chico, Santa Cruz and Gallegos) were sampled between September 1995 and November 1998 to determine their chemical and isotopic compositions, the origins of the suspended and dissolved river loads and their inputs to the South Atlantic Ocean. This paper focuses on the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) transport and its delta C-13 isotopic signature. The delta(13) C-DIC values vary between -12.8 and -1.8% and allow one to distinguish two river groups: (i) the Colorado, Negro, Chubut and Santa Cruz, which display the highest values and the lowest seasonal variations; (ii) the Deseado, Coyle, Chico and Gallegos, which show the lowest values and the highest seasonal variations. For the first group, delta C-13(DIC) is mainly controlled by important exchanges between the river waters and atmospheric CO2, due to the presence of lakes and dams. For the second group, delta(13) C-DIC also appears to be controlled by the oxidation of organic carbon, showing a negative relationship between delta 13 C-DIC and the dissolved organic carbon. These biogeochemical processes interfere with the contribution of carbonate and silicate weathering to the riverine DIC and do not allow use of delta(13) C-DIC alone to distinguish these contributions. The annual DIC flux exported by Patagonian Rivers to the South Atlantic Ocean averages 621 x 10(9) g. of C, i.e. a specific yield of 2-7 g m(-2) year(-1). The mean delta C-13(DIC) can be estimated to -4.9%, which is high compared with other rivers of the world. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据