4.7 Article

Clopidogrel effect on platelet REactivity in patients with stent thrombosis - Results of the CREST study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 46, 期 10, 页码 1827-1832

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.056

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether patients who suffered subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) have higher post-treatment reactivity than those who do not encounter stent thrombosis. BACKGROUND High post-treatment platelet reactivity has been reported after coronary stenting after clopidogrel therapy and may be an important factor in the occurrence of SAT. METHODS We identified patients with SAT treated at two tertiary care centers over a 1.5-year period. Light transmittance aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid, total and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa after stimulation with ADP, and vasodilatorstimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation levels to measure P2Y(12) receptor inhibition were determined (n = 20) and compared with an age-matched group of patients without SAT (n = 100). High post-treatment platelet reactivity was defined as > 75th percentile ADP-induced aggregation in the group without SAT. RESULTS The SAT patients had higher mean platelet reactivity than those without SAT by all measurements (p < 0.05): 49 +/- 4% versus 33 +/- 2% for 5 mu mol/l ADP-induced aggregation and 65 +/- 3% versus 51 +/- 2% for 20 mu mol/l ADP-induced aggregation (p < 0.001), 69 +/- 5% versus 46 +/- 9% for P2Y(12) reactivity ratio (p = 0.03), and 138 +/- 19 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) versus 42 4 MFI for stimulated GP IIb/IIIa expression (p < 0.001). Of patients with SAT, 60% had high platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS High post-treatment platelet reactivity and incomplete P2Y(12) receptor inhibition are risk factors for SAT. Measures to uniformly determine platelet reactivity after coronary stenting and treatment strategies to improve P2Y(12) receptor inhibition in patients with high post-treatment platelet reactivity should be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据