4.7 Article

Neutrophil stimulation with Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) results in the release of functional soluble TRAIL/Apo-2L

期刊

BLOOD
卷 106, 期 10, 页码 3474-3482

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1327

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA109446-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 034879-17] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BLRD VA [I01 BX000513] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) has been used to treat bladder cancer for almost 30 years; however, the effector mechanism of the BCG-induced antitumor response remains enigmatic. Most BCG research has focused on the mononuclear-cell infiltrate, but growing evidence supports a role for neutrophils in the antitumor response. Previously, we demonstrated increased urinary tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/ Apo-2L) levels from BCG-responsive patients compared to nonresponders. Interestingly, neutrophils isolated from the urine expressed TRAIL/Apo-2L, leading us to investigate the neutrophil response to BCG. BCG-stimulated neutrophils expressed surface-bound and released functional soluble TRAIL/Apo-2L. Whereas neither interferon a (IFN-alpha) nor IFN-gamma directly induced TRAIL/Apo2L expression by neutrophils, IFN-alpha did stimulate TRAIL gene transcription, and IFN-primed neutrophils contained and released more TRAIL/ Apo-2L after BCG stimulation than did unprimed neutrophils. In unstimulated neutrophils TRAIL/Apo-2L was present predominantly in the azurophilic granules and plasma-membrane-enriched/secretory-granule fraction. Finally, we observed that killed BCG, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 agonists, and an M tuberculosis cell-wall fraction were each capable of inducing the release of soluble TRAIL/Apo-2L from neutrophils. These results further characterize the potential role neutrophils may play in initiating the antitumor response described with BCG treatment for superficial bladder cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据