4.5 Review Book Chapter

Autophagy During Cardiac Stress: Joys and Frustrations of Autophagy

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 45-59

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135757

关键词

autophagosome; autophagy; bafilomycin A1; calcium overload; cardioprotection; catabolism/anabolism balance; chloroquine; exosome; flux; frustrated autophagy; glutathione; ischemia/reperfusion; ischemic preconditioning; lysosome; mitochondria; mitochondrial quality control; mitophagy; phagophore; preconditioning

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AG33283, P01 HL85577, R01 HL34579]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL085577, R01HL034579] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG033283] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of autophagy has been transformed by the cloning of most genes in the pathway and the introduction of GFP-LC3 as a reporter to allow visual assessment of autophagy. The field of cardiac biology is not alone in attempting to understand the implications of autophagy. The purpose of this review is to address some of the controversies and conundrums associated with the evolving studies of autophagy in the heart. Autophagy is a cellular process involving a complex orchestration of regulatory gene products as well as machinery for assembly, selective targeting, and degradation of autophagosomes and their contents. Our understanding of the role of autophagy in human disease is rapidly evolving as investigators examine the process in different tissues and different pathophysiological contexts. In the field of heart disease, autophagy has been examined in the settings of ischemia and reperfusion, preconditioning, cardiac hypertrophy, and heart failure. This review addresses the role of autophagy in cardioprotection, the balance of catabolism and anabolism, the concept of mitochondrial quality control, and the implications of impaired autophagic flux or frustrated autophagy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据