4.7 Article

Predictors of prostate cancer tissue acquisition by an undirected core bone marrow biopsy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - A Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 8109-8113

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1250

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U10 CA31946, U01-CA78967, CA31946, T32 CA009172] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Analyzing metastatic prostate cancer tissue is of considerable importance in evaluating new targeted agents, yet acquiring such tissue presents a challenge due to the predominance of bone metastases. We assessed factors predicting a successful tumor harvest from bone marrow biopsies (BMBx) in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer patients. Material and Methods: Data from Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 9663 were reviewed. Bone marrow biopsies were obtained from 184 patients who underwent an office-based, unguided bone marrow biopsy of the posterior iliac crest. Results: Forty-seven of the 184 patients (25.5%) had a positive bone marrow biopsy. When considered in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, lower hemoglobin levels, higher alkaline phosphatase, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels were associated with a higher likelihood of a positive BMBx. The median survival time was 11 months (95% confidence interval, 8.0-14) among patients with a positive BMBx compared with 23 months (95% confidence interval, 19-27) with a negative BMBx. The median time to progression and time to prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival were also significantly decreased among positive BMBx patients. No patients with a positive BMBx survived beyond 3 years, whereas 11 of the 137 patients with a negative BMBx survived beyond 5 years. Discussion: Using common laboratory values, a specific patient cohort can be defined from whom the yield of a nonguided BMBx would be high enough to justify this approach. For studies that require broader entry criteria, a more directed approach with image guidance is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据