4.6 Article

Pregnancy is not a risk factor for gallstone disease: Results of a randomly selected population sample

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 11, 期 43, 页码 6800-6806

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800

关键词

Cholecystolithiasis; Pregnancy; Risk factors; Selection bias; Ultrasonography

资金

  1. Baden-Wurttemberg state health office
  2. District Government Stuttgart, Germany
  3. Ravensburg, Germany
  4. city of Leutkirch, Germany
  5. German Research Council [GRK 1041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and selection of the study population for cholecystolithiasis in an urban population in Germany, in relation to our own findings and to the results in the international literature. METHODS: A total of 2 147 persons (1 111 females, age 42.8 +/- 12.7 years; 1 036 males, age 42.3 +/- 13.1 years) participating in an investigation on the prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis were studied for risk factors and prevalence of gallbladder stone disease. Risk factors were assessed by means of a standardized interview and calculation of body mass index (BMI). A diagnostic ultrasound examination of the gallbladder was performed. Data were analyzed by multiple logistic regression, using the SAS statistical software package. RESULTS: Gallbladder stones were detected in 171 study participants (8.0%, n = 2 147). Risk factors for the development of gallbladder stone disease included age, sex, BMI, and positive family history. In a separate analysis of female study participants, pregnancy (yes/no) and number of pregnancies did not exert any influence. CONCLUSION: Findings of the present study confirm that age, female sex, BMI, and positive family history are risk factors for the development of gallbladder stone disease. Pregnancy and the number of pregnancies, however, could not be shown to be risk factors. There seem to be no differences in the respective prevalence for gallbladder stone disease in urban and rural populations. (C) 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据