4.5 Article

Alpha-9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor immunoreactivity in the rodent vestibular labyrinth

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 492, 期 3, 页码 323-333

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20739

关键词

efferent; hair cells; crista ampullaris; otolith; macular organ; vestibular ganglion

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC003086, R01 DC02521, R01 DC002521-10, R01 DC03086, R01 DC002521] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vestibular tissues (cristae ampullares, macular otolithic organs, and Scarpa's ganglia) in chinchilla, rat, and guinea pig were examined for immunoreactivity to the alpha 9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit. The a9 antibody was generated against a conserved peptide present in the intracellular loop of the predicted protein sequence of the guinea pig alpha 9 nAChR subunit. In the vestibular periphery, staining was observed in calyces around type I hair cells, at the synaptic pole of type II hair cells, and in varying levels in Scarpa's ganglion cells. Ganglion cells were also triply labeled to detect alpha 9, calretinin, and peripherin. Calretinin labels calyx-only afferents. Peripherin labels bouton-only afferents. Dimorphic afferents, which have both calyx and bouton endings, are not labeled by calretinin or peripherin. In these experiments, alpha 9 was expressed in both calyx and dimorphic afferents. A subpopulation of small ganglion cells did not contain the alpha 9 nAChR but did stain for peripherin. We surmise that these are bouton-only afferents. Bouton (regularly discharging) afferents also show efferent responses, although they are qualitatively different from those in irregularly discharging (calyx and dimorphic) afferents, much slower and longer lasting. Thus, regular afferents are probably more affected via a muscarinic cholinergic or a peptidergic mechanism, with a much smaller superimposed fast nicotinic-type response. This latter response could be due to one of the other nicotinic receptors that have been described in studies from other laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据