4.8 Article

The β1a subunit is essential for the assembly of dihydropyridine-receptor arrays in skeletal muscle

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508710102

关键词

calcium channels; excitation-contraction coupling; tetrads; zebrafish

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P 17807, P 17806] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR P01 144650] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Homozygous zebrafish of the mutant relaxed (red(ts25)) are paralyzed and die within days after hatching. A significant reduction of intramembrane charge movements and the lack of depolarization-induced but not caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients suggested a defect in the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR). Sequencing of DHPR cDNAs indicated that the alpha(1S) subunit is normal, whereas the beta(1a) subunit harbors a single point mutation resulting in a premature stop. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that the mutated gene is transcribed, but Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry demonstrated the complete loss of the beta(1a) protein in mutant muscle. Thus, the immotile zebrafish relaxed is a Pia-null mutant. Interestingly, immunocytochemistry showed correct triad targeting of the alpha(1S) subunit in the absence of beta(1a). Freeze-fracture analysis of the DHPR clusters in relaxed myotubes revealed an approximate to 2-fold reduction in cluster size with a normal density of DHPR particles within the clusters. Most importantly, DHPR particles in the junctional membranes of the immotile zebrafish mutant relaxed entirely lacked the normal arrangement in arrays of tetrads. Thus, our data indicate that the lack of the beta(1a) subunit does not prevent triad targeting of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit but precludes the skeletal muscle-specific arrangement of DHPR particles opposite the ryanodine receptor (RyR1). This defect properly explains the complete deficiency of skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling in beta(1)-null model organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据