4.8 Article

Early experience in humans is associated with changes in neuropeptides critical for regulating social behavior

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504767102

关键词

attachment; emotion; oxytocin; vasopressin; child abuse

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P51 RR000167, 5P51 RR 000167] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [P30 HD 03352, P30 HD003352] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH 068858, R01 MH061285, R01 MH068858, T32 MH018931, T32 MH 18931] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [R01 035215] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of social attachments is a critical component of human relationships. Infants begin to bond to their caregivers from the moment of birth, and these social bonds continue to provide regulatory emotional functions throughout adulthood. It is difficult to examine the interactions between social experience and the biological origins of these complex behaviors because children undergo both brain development and accumulate social experience at the same time. We had a rare opportunity to examine children who were reared in extremely aberrant social environments where they were deprived of the kind of care-giving typical for our species. The present experiment in nature provides insight into the role of early experience on the brain systems underlying the development of emotional behavior. These data indicate that the vasopressin and oxytocin neuropepticle systems, which are critical in the establishment of social bonds and the regulation of emotional behaviors, are affected by early social experience. The results of this experiment suggest a potential mechanism whose atypical function may explain the pervasive social and emotional difficulties observed in many children who have experienced aberrant care-giving. The present findings are consistent with the view that there is a critical role for early experience in the development of the brain systems underlying basic aspects of human social behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据