4.4 Article

Electronic structure studies of the adenosylcobalamin cofactor in glutamate mutase

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 46, 页码 15167-15181

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi051094y

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK45776] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008293, T32 GM08293, GM59227] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutamate mutase (GM) is a cobalamin-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the reversible interconversion of L-glutamate and L-threo-3-methylaspartate via a radical-based mechanism. To initiate catalysis, the 5'-deoxyadenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl) cofactor's Co-C bond is cleaved homolytically to generate an adenosyl radical and Co(2+)Cbl. In this work, we employed a combination of spectroscopic and computational tools to evaluate possible mechanisms by which the Co-C bond is activated for homolysis. Minimal perturbations to the electronic absorption (Abs), circular dichroism (CD), and magnetic CD (MCD) spectra of AdoCbl are observed upon formation of holoenzyme, even in the presence of substrate (or a substrate analogue), indicating that destabilization of the Co(3+)Cbl ground state is an unlikely mechanism for Co-C bond activation. In contrast, striking alterations are observed in the spectroscopic data of the post-homolysis product Co(2+)Cbl when bound to glutamate mutase in the presence of substrate (or a substrate analogue) as compared to unbound Co(2+)Cbl. These enzymatic perturbations appear to most strongly affect the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer transitions of Co(2+)Cbl. suggesting that the cofactor/active-site interactions give rise to a fairly uniform stabilization of the Co 3d orbitals. Remarkable similarities between the results obtained in this study and those reported previously for the related Cbl-dependent isomerase methylmalonyl-CoA mutase indicate that a common mechanism by which the cofactor's Co-C bond is activated for homolytic cleavage may be operative for all base-off/His-on Cbl-dependent isomerases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据