4.8 Article

FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations induce myeloproliferative or lymphoid disease in a transgenic mouse model

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 24, 期 53, 页码 7882-7892

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208933

关键词

FLT3 tyrosine kinase; transgenic; mouse; leukemia

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA66996] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [5T32HL 07627-16] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK50654] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activating FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations have been identified in similar to 30% of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and recently in a smaller subset of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To explore the in vivo consequences of an activating FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutation (FLT3-ITD), we created a transgenic mouse model in which FLT3-ITD was expressed under the control of the vav hematopoietic promoter. Five independent lines of vavFLT3-ITD transgenic mice developed a myeloproliferative disease with high penetrance and a disease latency of 6-12 months. The phenotype was characterized by splenomegaly, megakaryocytic hyperplasia, and marked thrombocythemia, but without leukocytosis, polycythemia, or marrow fibrosis, displaying features reminiscent of the human disease essential thrombocythemia (ET). Clonal immature B- or T-lymphoid disease was observed in two additional founder mice, respectively, that could be secondarily transplanted to recipient mice that rapidly developed lymphoid disease. Treatment of these mice with the FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PKC412, resulted in suppression of disease and a statistically significant prolongation of survival. These results demonstrate that FLT3-ITD is capable of inducing myeloproliferative as well as lymphoid disease, and indicate that small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be an effective treatment for lymphoid malignancies in humans that are associated with activating mutations in FLT3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据