4.7 Article

Cardiac myosin-binding protein-C phosphorylation and cardiac function

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 97, 期 11, 页码 1156-1163

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000190605.79013.4d

关键词

mouse; mouse mutants; muscle; muscle contraction; myocardial contractility

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69799, HL52318, P01 HL069779, P50 HL052318, HL60546, R01 HL056370, P50 HL074728, HL56370] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of cardiac myosin binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) phosphorylation in cardiac physiology or pathophysiology is unclear. To investigate the status of cMyBP-C phosphorylation in vivo, we determined its phosphorylation state in stressed and unstressed mouse hearts. cMyBP-C phosphorylation is significantly decreased during the development of heart failure or pathologic hypertrophy. We then generated transgenic (TG) mice in which the phosphorylation sites of cMyBP-C were changed to nonphosphorylatable alanines (MyBP-CA11P-). A TG line showing approximate to 40% replacement with MyBP- CA11P- showed no changes in morbidity or mortality but displayed depressed cardiac contractility, altered sarcomeric structure and upregulation of transcripts associated with a hypertrophic response. To explore the effect of complete replacement of endogenous cMyBP-C with MyBP-C-A11P (-), the mice were bred into the MyBP-C((t/t)) background, in which less than 10% of normal levels of a truncated MyBP-C are present. Although MyBP-C-A11P (-) was incorporated into the sarcomere and expressed at normal levels, the mutant protein could not rescue the MyBP-C((t/t)) phenotype. The mice developed significant cardiac hypertrophy with myofibrillar disarray and fibrosis, similar to what was observed in the MyBP-C((t/t)) animals. In contrast, when the MyBP-C((t/t)) mice were bred to a TG line expressing normal MyBP-C (MyBP-C-WT), the MyBP-C((t/t)) phenotype was rescued. These data suggest that cMyBP-C phosphorylation is essential for normal cardiac function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据