4.7 Article

Ion-selective electrodes:: Polyaniline modification and anion recognition

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 553, 期 1-2, 页码 160-168

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.08.018

关键词

ion-selective electrode; surface modification; polyaniline; anion recognition; conducting polymer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel arrangement for polymeric membranes used in ion-selective electrodes is presented. The surface of a conventional plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) membrane was coated with a chemically generated film of a conducting polymer, polyaniline (PANI). The effect of PANI on the anionic potentiometric response of PVC membranes derived from calix[4]pyrrole and tridodecylmethylammonium chloride (TDDMACI) is reported. Five different types of electrodes with the following membrane compositions were studied: (1) PVC/PANI (a reference experiment), (2) PVC + TDDMACI (as anion-exchanger)/PANI, (3) PVC + calix[4]pyrrole (as neutral carrier)/PANI, (4) PVC + calix[4]pyrrole + TDDMACI (uncoated membrane) and (5) PVC + calix[4]pyrrole + TDDMACl/PANI. Hydrophilicity of the uncoated and PANI-coated membrane surfaces was assessed by measurements of water contact angle, theta. In the protonated state, the neat PANI is more hydrophilic, theta = 49 degrees, than in its deprotonated base form, theta = 94 degrees. After surface deposition of thin PANI film, increased potentiometric sensitivity of the membranes, especially towards hydrophilic anions (F-, H2PO4-), was achieved. The distinct differences in the character of calix[4]pyrrole (neutral carrier) and TDDMACI (anion-exchanger) to sense anionic species were retained and became more pronounced. The PANI film may be regarded as a novel kind of an electrode modifier for anion-sensing. The role of the PANI film in the formation of the potentiometric response is discussed. It is proposed that the PANI film acts as an anion-exchanger. The transport of anions through a thin PANI film is also affected by the character of anions and by pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据