4.4 Article

The influence of the enzymatic composition of lamb rennet paste on some properties of experimentally produced PDO Fiore Sardo cheese

期刊

INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 1271-1278

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.11.012

关键词

rennet preparations; PDO Fiore Sardo cheese; lipolysis; free fatty acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experiment on PDO (Protected Designation of Origin) Fiore Sardo cheese making was carried out to assess the influence of rennet paste on cheese quality. Four different preparations of lamb rennet paste (A, B, C and D) were used. Rennet A came exclusively from suckling lambs slaughtered immediately after suckling, rennet B from suckling lambs not fed for 12 h, and rennets C and D from suckling lambs allowed to graze and slaughtered in the same way as A and B, respectively. In vitro lipolysis and multiple cheese-making trials were carried out for each rennet. The enzymatic composition of the prepared rennets was different. Lipolytic activity was assessed in vitro by measuring the quantity of free fatty acids released by hydrolysis of a sheep milk cream substrate. Rennet A had the greatest lipolytic activity, which had a strong preference for esters of short-chain fatty acids. The cheeses made using the different rennets did not differ significantly in their moisture, protein and fat content or in the nitrogen fractions which resulted from proteolysis. The cheese produced with rennet A had the highest lipolysis. Short-chain fatty acids, in particular butyric acid, were prevalent, as they were in the in vitro trials. The diet and the presence of milk in the abomasa was responsible for the enzymatic peculiarities of rennet A. Suckling stimulated the secretion of pre-gastric lipase from the pharingeal tissue. Thus, if one wishes to produce a rennet with the particular enzymatic composition necessary for a particular cheese, the diet and the slaughtering conditions of the lambs should be controlled. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据