相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Fate of Manuscripts Previously Rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: A Follow-Up Analysis
R. J. McDonald et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY (2009)
Do women have less success in peer review?
Herbert Marsh et al.
NATURE (2009)
A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts
Christoph Neuhaus et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2009)
Funding of young scientist and scientific excellence
Stefan Hornbostel et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2009)
The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology
T. Opthof et al.
NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL (2009)
Fairness as Appropriateness Negotiating Epistemological Differences in Peer Review
Gregoire Mallard et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2009)
The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
Lutz Bornmann et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2009)
The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process
Jerry Suls et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2009)
Appeals
Peter Goelitz
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION (2008)
The effectiveness of the peer review process: Inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte chemie
Lutz Bornmann et al.
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION (2008)
Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
April W. Armstrong et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY (2008)
Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review:: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2008)
Author perception of peer review
Mark Gibson et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2008)
Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
Lutz Bornmann et al.
PLOS ONE (2008)
Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system
Valen E. Johnson
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2008)
Reviewing peer review
Bruce Alberts et al.
SCIENCE (2008)
Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: An exploratory study
David B. Resnik et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2008)
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication
Lutz Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2008)
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2008)
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications - Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability
Herbert W. Marsh et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2008)
UK research assessment exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?
Henk F. Moed
SCIENTOMETRICS (2008)
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review
Lutz Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2007)
Fate of submitted manuscripts rejected from the American journal of neuroradiology: Outcomes and commentary
R. J. McDonald et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY (2007)
Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index -: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)
Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)
Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2007)
Garfield and the impact factor
Stephen J. Bensman
ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2007)
Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications
V Demicheli et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2007)
Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
Herbert W. Marsh et al.
AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2007)
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants
Lutz Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2006)
Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact
Tim Brody et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2006)
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
R Smith
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2006)
Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors
Brian C. Martinson et al.
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS (2006)
The shift in academic quality control
S Hemlin et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2006)
The numerical equivalence between the impact factor of journals and the quality of the articles
Eduardo Figueredo
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2006)
Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows - A boolean probit analysis
L Bornmann et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT (2005)
Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications
L Bornmann et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2005)
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions
L Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2005)
Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
U Pöschl
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2004)
Relation between online hit counts and subsequent citations:: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ
TV Perneger
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)
Interrater reliability in grading abstracts for the Orthopaedic Trauma Association
M Bhandari et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2004)
Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline
Arthur G. Bedeian
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION (2004)
Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature
E Garfield
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (2004)
Rater agreement and rater severity: A many-faceted Rasch analysis of performance assessments in the Test Deutsch als Fremdsprache (TestDaF)
T Eckes
DIAGNOSTICA (2004)
The manuscript review process - The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors
AG Bedeian
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY (2003)
Why are women underused in the JECH peer review process?
MD Davo et al.
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2003)
Publishing as prostitution? - Choosing between one's own ideas and academic success
BS Frey
PUBLIC CHOICE (2003)
Effects of reviewers' gender on assessments of a gender-related standardized manuscript
AS Caelleigh et al.
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE (2003)
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
UW Jayasinghe et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2003)
A mixture model approach to indexing rater agreement
C Schuster
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2002)
Gender bias in the refereeing process?
T Tregenza
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2002)
Peer review in the funding of research in higher education: The Australian experience
UW Jayasinghe et al.
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS (2001)
The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal
J Ray et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2000)
分享论文
