4.6 Article

A controlled trial of methylphenidate in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 100, 期 12, 页码 1868-1874

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01272.x

关键词

attention-deficit; hyperactivity disorder; methylphenidate; placebo-controlled trial; placebo response; substance use disorders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is common among adult patients with substance use disorders. The benefits of treating ADHD in these patients are uncertain and the prescription of psychostimulants is disputed, because of the risk of abuse. This study examined the short-term effectiveness of methylphenidate treatment for ADHD in adults with substance use disorders. Design Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple cross-over (A-B-A-B design) comparative trial of methylphenidate versus placebo. Setting In-patient addiction treatment facility. Participants Twenty-five patients with ADHD who were receiving in-patient treatment for various substance use disorders. Intervention During the course of 8 weeks, each participant completed two phases of placebo and two phases of active medication treatment, in a fixed low-dosage schedule (up to 0.6 mg/kg/day). Abstinence was maintained during the study. Measurements The outcome measure was ADHD symptomatology, as measured with the ADHD rating scale-IV. The results were compared using MANOVA repeated measures. Conclusions Nineteen of the 25 patients completed the trial. A significant reduction in ADHD symptoms was observed in the first week in both conditions. The positive response to active treatment (nine patients; 36%) was not significantly higher than that to placebo (five patients; 20%). In this small pilot study, the effect of low-dose methylphenidate in adult ADHD patients with concomitant substance use disorders is limited. ADHD symptoms in adults were susceptible to a distinct short-term placebo response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据