4.2 Article

Hydroxamide derivatives of short-chain fatty acid have erythropoietic activity and induce γ gene expression in vivo

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 1443-1449

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.08.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL20899] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK45365] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The hydroxamic acid derivatives of short-chain fatty acids, butyryl and propionyl hydroxamate, subericbishydoxamic acid, and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, are potent inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and have been shown to induce fetal hemoglobin in vitro. In this study we examined whether these compounds have erythropoietic activity and can induce gamma globin gene expression in vivo. Materials and Methods. Transgenic mice heterozygous for a deletion beta thalassemia and hemizygous for a human gamma globin transgene were treated with these compounds and hematologic responses as well as the induction of gamma gene expression were evaluated. Hematologic studies included measurement of reticulocytes, hematocrit, and the in vivo levels of BFU-E. Effects on globin gene expression were assessed by measuring F reticulocytes and the human gamma/ murine alpha globin mRNA ratios by RNAse protection assay. Results. Propionyl and butyryl hydroxamate increased reticulocytes by 71% and 139%, the in vivo BFU-E counts by 75% and 51%, and the in vivo gamma gene expression by 33.9% and 71% respectively. SBHA and SAHA had no erythropoietic activity in vivo. Conclusion. Hydroxamic acid derivatives can stimulate the in vivo erythropoiesis and fetal globin production in a thalassemic murine model. The combined effect of certain histone deacetylase inhibitors on erythropoiesis and on gamma gene expression make these compounds desirable targets for development of therapeutics for beta chain hemoglobinopathies. (c) 2005 International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据