4.5 Article

Selective antagonist at D3 receptors, but not non-selective partial agonists, influences the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in free-feeding rats

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 82, 期 4, 页码 727-734

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.11.015

关键词

substance abuse; cocaine; D-3 receptor; BP 897; brain concentrations; conditioned place preference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The non-selective dopamine (DA) D-3 partial agonist BP 897 influenced rats' seeking behavior induced by cocaine-associated cues but there are contradictions about its ability to modulate cocaine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), and mechanisms involved. We therefore reevaluated its activity on both acquisition and expression of these behaviors, taking into consideration the actual brain concentrations of unchanged drug and its potential active metabolite 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine (oOCH(3)PP), as well as its negative motivational properties. BP 897 induced conditioned place aversion (CPA) at 3 mg/kg, but not at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg. However, in this range of amply spaced doses BP 897 did not affect the acquisition and expression of cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.) CPP in rats, although its brain concentrations were well above those affecting in vitro D-3 receptors. Concentrations of oOCH(3)PP were below the limits of quantification of the analytical procedure. As concerns the expression behavior, its structurally and pharmacologically related derivative N-[4-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl]butyl]benzo[b]furan-2-carboxamide (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.) also had no such effect. By contrast, the selective D-3 receptor antagonist SB-277011-A (3 mg/kg, i.p.) antagonized the expression of cocaine-induced CPP, supporting the suggestion that full antagonist activity at D-3 receptors is necessary to prevent 10 mg/kg cocaine-induced place conditioning in free-feeding rats. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据