4.7 Article

Modeling nucleotide evolution at the mesoscale:: The phylogeny of the Neotropical pitvipers of the Porthidium group (Viperidae: Crotalinae)

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 881-898

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.05.013

关键词

akaike weights; Atropoides; Bayes factors; Cerrophidion; MCMC model testing; Porthidium; relative Bayes factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed the phylogeny of the Neotropical pitvipers within the Porthidium group (including intra-specific through intergeneric relationships) using 1.4 kb of DNA sequences front two mitochondrial protein-coding genes (ND4 and cyt-b). We investigated how Bayesian Markov chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) phylogenetic hypotheses based on this 'mesoscale' datasct were affected by analysis under various complex models of nucleotide evolution that partition models across the dataset. We develop an approach, employing three statistics (Akaike weights, Bayes factors, and relative Bayes factors), for examining the performance of complex models in order to identily the best-fit model for data analysis. Our results Suggest that: (1) model choice may have important practical effects oil phylogenetic Conclusions even for mesoscale datasets, (2) the use of a complex partitioned model did not produce widespread increases or decreases in nodal posterior probability support, and (3) most differences in resolution resulting from model choice were concentrated at deeper nodes. Our phylogenetic estimates of relationships among members of the Porthidium group (genera: A tropoides, Cerrophidion, and Porthidium) resolve the monophyly of the three genera. Bayesian MCMC results suggest that Cerrophidion and Porthidium form a clade that is the sister taxon to Atropoides. In addition to resolving the intra-specific relationships among a majority of Porthidium group taxa, our results highlight phylogeographic patterns across Middle and South America and Suggest that each of the three genera may harbor undescribed species diversity. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据