4.3 Article

Left atrial systolic force and cardiovascular outcome - The Strong Heart Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 1570-1576

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.036

关键词

echocardiography; atrial function; diastole; and prognosis

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01RR0047-34] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01-HL41652, U01-HL41654, U01-HL41642] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The force needed to fill the left ventricle (LV) in late diastole (left atrial systolic force [LASF]) is abnormal in diseased hearts. The goal of this study was to determine whether LASF adds to prognostic prediction of other markers of preclinical cardiovascular disease in a population with a high prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. Methods: Doppler echocardiography was performed on 2808 participants of the Strong Heart Study (age 59.3 +/- 8.0 years, 62.5% women, 43.0% hypertensive, 46.7% diabetic, and 54.1% obese) without valvular abnormalities or previous cardiovascular events. The LASF was estimated from mitral orifice area and mitral peak A velocity. Results: The LASF was correlated with older age, higher BP, body mass index, creatinine, serum glucose, insulin levels, and heart rate. After controlling for clinical covariates, LASF was independently associated with higher LV dimensions, LV mass, stroke volume, and cardiac output (all P < .01). In Cox regression analysis, greater LASF was associated with a higher rate of CV events (HR = 1.033, 95% Cl = 1.005 to 1.061; P = .021), independently of demographic characteristics, risk factors, LV geometry, and transmittal diastolic pattern. Conclusions: in a population-based sample of middle-aged and elderly adults with a high prevalence of hypertension and diabetes and without prevalent cardiovascular disease, LASF was associated with geometric changes of the heart and with increased rate of combined fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据