4.6 Article

Matrix contraction by dermal fibroblasts requires transforming growth factor-β/activin-linked kinase 5, heparan sulfate-containing proteoglycans, and MEK/ERK -: Insights into pathological scarring in chronic fibrotic disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 167, 期 6, 页码 1699-1711

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61252-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD037490, R01 HD37490] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scarring is characterized by excessive synthesis and contraction of extracellular matrix. Here, we show that fibroblasts from scarred (lesional) areas of patients with the chronic fibrotic disorder diffuse scleroderma [diffuse systemic sclerosis (dSSc)] show an enhanced ability to adhere to and contract extracellular matrix, relative to fibroblasts from unscarred (nonlesional) areas of dSSc patients and dermal fibroblasts from normal, healthy individuals. The contractile abilities of normal and dSSc dermal fibroblasts were suppressed by blocking heparin sulfate-containing proteoglycan biosynthesis or antagonizing transforming growth factor-P receptor type I [activin-linked kinase (ALK5)] or ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Compared with both normal and nonlesional fibroblasts, lesional dSSc fibroblasts overexpressed the heparin sulfate-containing proteoglycan syndecan 4. We also found that the procontractile signals from transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta were integrated through syndecan 4 and MEK/ERK because the ability of TGF beta to induce contraction of dermal fibroblasts was prevented by MEK antagonism. TGF beta could not induce a contractile phenotype or phosphorylate ERK in syndecan 4(-/-) dermal fibroblasts. These results suggest that integrating TGF beta and ERK signals via syndecan 4 is essential for the contractile ability of dermal fibroblasts. We conclude that antagonizing MEK/ERK, TGF beta 1/ALK5, or syndecan 4 may alleviate scarring in chronic fibrotic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据