4.5 Article

Chernozem -: Soil of the Year 2005

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
卷 168, 期 6, 页码 725-740

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200521814

关键词

Chernozem; Soil of the Year 2005; soil classification; soil genesis; soil characteristics; Static Fertilization Experiment Bad Lauchstadt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proclamation of the Soil of the Year was made for the first time in Germany in 2005 on occasion of the World Soil Day. Chernozems were selected for this purpose. In this paper an overview of these groups of soils is given. Chernozems are concentrated in the drought region of Central Germany. A standard profile from the core area of Chernozems developed from loess is presented with comprehensive laboratory analysis. Chernozems developed primarily upon carbonatic loess substrates under summer-dry climatic conditions in an open park-like landscape with isolated forest stands. The development of Chernozems began as early as the late glacial period, and they were fully developed by the Atlantikum age. The far-reaching, uniformly thick humus horizons indicate substrate differences in the loess cover, which are partly the result of bioturbation. Within Germany, Chernozems and Chernozem-like soils make up approx. 3% of the surface area and 5% (approx. 11,000 km(2)) of the arable land. The results of the Static Fertilization Experiment in Bad Lauchstadt, founded in 1902, clarify the high value of Chernozem for biomass production and the environment. Each loss due to erosion or decrease in surface area reduces the fulfillment of soil ecological functions of the soils and is comparable to a loss of animal and plant species. Therefore, soil scientists and the results of soil research must be more comprehensively implemented for soil preservation, protection, and politics. For acceptance of these goals among the general public and the political-decision makers, the campaign Soil of the Year should give some thought-provoking impulses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据