4.7 Article

Epithelial cadherin distribution in abnormal human pre-implantation embryos

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 20, 期 12, 页码 3369-3375

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei242

关键词

blastocyst; compaction; E-cadherin; fragmentation; trophectoderm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: E(epithelial)-cadherin is a vital cell adhesion protein that plays a critical role in morphogenesis. Previous studies of E-cadherin distribution in human embryos have produced equivocal results. METHODS: Immunocytochemistry in conjunction with laser scanning confocal microscopy was used to detect E-cadherin in 97 human cleavage stage embryos and 35 blastocysts from normal and abnormal fertilization. An antibody against human placental E-cadherin was used to locate the protein. RESULTS: In blastomeres of cleaving embryos on the second and third days following insemination, E-cadherin was located in the cytoplasm-mostly concentrated in the cell margins. On the fourth day of development, the protein was relocated in compacting embryos to membranes in areas of cell-cell contact. In other abnormally compacted or non-compacted embryos with extensive cytoplasmic fragmentation, cell arrest or blastomere multi-nucleation, E-cadherin relocalization was either absent or erratic. In apparently normal blastocysts, E-cadherin in the inner cells was diffuse and cytoplasmic while properly organized trophectoderm cells were surrounded by a band of membrane E-cadherin. Disorganization of trophectoderm was associated with disruption of the regular E-cadherin banding pattern. CONCLUSION: As in other mammalian species examined, E-cadherin distribution in human embryos is stage-dependent. Disturbances in the distribution of E-cadherin occur in embryos with cleavage abnormalities and suggest one path to abortive or abnormal blastulation and loss of embryonic viability. The implications of similar changes in the blastocyst are well worth investigating since they could threaten blastocyst integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据