4.5 Article

Infection site concentrations: Their therapeutic importance and the macrolide and macrolide-like class of antibiotics

期刊

PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 150S-158S

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1592/phco.2005.25.12part2.150S

关键词

macrolide; infection site concentration; population modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Much confusion exists over the pharmacodynamics of macrolides, azalides, and ketolides, as the concentration-time profile for these agents is low relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogens for which they are used. Studies of respiratory tract infection have highlighted the importance of drug concentrations at the site of infection and have demonstrated a role for white blood cells in the delivery of drug to the infection site. Population mathematical modeling and Monte Carlo simulation have shown that the ability of macrolides, azalides, and ketolides to concentrate at the infection site has a considerable effect on microbial activity. Studies of the pharmacodynamics of these agents in animal models have centered on the mouse thigh model; however, the suitability of this model for investigation of respiratory tract infections for macrolides and macrolide-like drugs is questionable. Comparison of the mouse thigh model with the mouse lung model shows immediate discrepancies, such as a need for higher area under the concentration-time curve (AUC):MIC ratios in the mouse thigh. There are obvious failings in the use of a thigh model, as it does not take into account the accumulation of white blood cells in the epithelial lining fluid and therefore ignores the impact of white blood cell delivery to the site of infection and release of significant amounts of drug during phagocytosis. Ultimately, whereas the mouse pneumonia model is useful in identifying pharmaco dynamically linked variables and the magnitude of variable required for a successful microbiologic outcome, extrapolation to human dosing must involve the use of human epithelial lining fluid penetration data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据