4.7 Article

Quantification of gap junction selectivity

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 289, 期 6, 页码 C1535-C1546

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00182.2005

关键词

connexin 43; connexin 37; diffusion rate constant

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-077675, HL-58732] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gap junctions, which are essential for functional coordination and homeostasis within tissues, permit the direct intercellular exchange of small molecules. The abundance and diversity of this exchange depends on the number and selectivity of the comprising channels and on the transjunctional gradient for and chemical character of the permeant molecules. Limited knowledge of functionally significant permeants and poor detectability of those few that are known have made it difficult to define channel selectivity. Presented herein is a multifaceted approach to the quantification of gap junction selectivity that includes determination of the rate constant for intercellular diffusion of a fluorescent probe ( k(2)- DYE) and junctional conductance ( g(j)) for each junction studied, such that the selective permeability ( k(2)- (DYE)/ g(j)) for dyes with differing chemical characteristics or junctions with differing connexin ( Cx) compositions ( or treatment conditions) can be compared. In addition, selective permeability can be correlated using single- channel conductance when this parameter is also measured. Our measurement strategy is capable of detecting 1) rate constants and selective permeabilities that differ across three orders of magnitude and 2) acute changes in that rate constant. Using this strategy, we have shown that 1) the selective permeability of Cx43 junctions to a small cationic dye varied across two orders of magnitude, consistent with the hypothesis that the various channel configurations adopted by Cx43 display different selective permeabilities; and 2) the selective permeability of Cx37 vs. Cx43 junctions was consistently and significantly lower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据