4.4 Article

Home environmental intervention in inner-city asthma: a randomized controlled clinical trial

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 518-524

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61012-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL058942] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES09606] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Airborne pollutants and indoor allergens increase asthma morbidity in inner-city children; therefore, reducing exposure, if feasible, should improve asthma morbidity. Objective: To conduct a randomized controlled trial of methods to reduce environmental pollutant and allergen exposure in the homes of asthmatic children living in the inner city. Methods: After the completion of questionnaires, spirometry and allergen skin tests, home inspection, and measurement of home air pollutant and allergen levels, 100 asthmatic children aged 6 to 12 years were randomized to the treatment group (home-based education, cockroach and rodent extermination, mattress and pillow encasings, and high-efficiency particulate air cleaner) or to the control group (treated at the end of the I-year trial). Outcomes were evaluated by home evaluations at 6 and 12 months, clinic evaluation at 12 months, and multiple telephone interviews. Results: In the treatment group, 84% received cockroach extermination and 75% used the air cleaner. Levels of particulate matter 10 Am or smaller declined by LIP to 39% in the treatment group but increased in the control group (P < .001). Cockroach allergen levels decreased by 51% in the treatment group. Daytime symptoms increased in the control group and decreased in the treatment group (P = .04). Other measures of morbidity, such as spirometry findings, nighttime symptoms, and emergency department use, were not significantly changed. Conclusions: A tailored, multifaceted environmental treatment reduced airborne particulate matter and indoor allergen levels in inner-city homes, which, in turn, had a modest effect on morbidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据