4.7 Article

Free radical scavenging and antigenotoxic activities of natural phenolic compounds in dried flowers of Hibiscus sabdariffa L

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 12, 页码 1120-1128

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200500084

关键词

Hibiscus sabdariffa; micronucleus; phenolics; radical scavenger

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antioxidant and free radical scavenging effects of two fractions of the ethanolic extract (HSCF, chloroform soluble fraction and HSEA, ethyl acetate soluble fraction) obtained from the dried flowers of Hibiscus sabdariffa L were investigated. The total antioxidant activity of the extracts was estimated to be 4.6 and 8.6 mM of vitamin C for HSCF and HSEA, respectively. Both HSCF and HSEA scavenged hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (79-94%) at the dose of 500 mu g. Similarly, the extracts showed inhibitory (70-80%) effects on superoxide anions radicals (O-2(-center dot)) at a dose of 1000 mu g. The concentrations required for a 50% scavenging of hydroxyl radical (OH) (IC50) were 380 and 200 mu g for HSCF and HSEA, respectively. HSEA and HSCF were better scavengers of O-2(-center dot), (OH)-O-center dot and H2O2 as compared to BHA, quercetin and alpha-tocopherol. At a concentration of 25 mu g/mL HSCF and HSEA exhibited 32 and 38% inhibition on CCl4-NADPH-induced lipid peroxidation, respectively, while both extracts exhibited 80 and 89% inhibitory effects at 100 mu g/mL. Pretreatment with H. sabdariffa extracts orally with 100 mg/kg and 250 mg/kg simultaneously with intraperitoneal injection FeCl2-ascorbic acid-ADP mixture reduced (p < 0.01) the formation of malondialdehyde content. Treatment of rats with HSCF, HSEA and vitamin C (standard antioxidant) significantly inhibited the induction of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes by sodium arsenite (2.5 mg/kg) (p < 0.001) after 24 h by 60, 70 and 50%, respectively. The results indicate that extracts of H. sabdariffa showed strong antimutagenic activity and free radical scavenging effects on active oxygen species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据