4.6 Review Book Chapter

Evolution of the Genus Homo

期刊

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100202

关键词

palcoanthropology; human evolution; hominid diversity; human fossil record; hominid systematics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Definition of the genus Homo is almost as fraught as the definition of Homo sapiens. We look at the evidence for early Homo, finding little morphological basis for extending our genus to any of the similar to 2.5-1.6-myr-old fossil forms assigned to early Homo or Homo habilis/rudolfensis. We also point to heterogeneity among early African Homo erectus, and the lack of apomorphies linking these fossils to the Asian Homo erectus group, a cohesive regional clade that shows some internal variation, including brain size increase Over time. The first truly cosmopolitan Homo species is Homo heidelbergensis, known from Africa, Europe, mid China following 600 kyr ago. One species sympatric with it included the >500-kyr-old Sima de los Huesos fossils front Spain, clearly distinct from Homo heidelbergensis and the oldest hominids assignable to the clade additionally containing Homo neanderthalensis. This clade also shows evidence of brain size expansion with time; but although Homo neanderthalensis had a large brain, it left no unequivocal evidence of the symbolic consciousness that makes our species unique. Homo sapiens clearly originated in Africa, where it existed as a physical entity before it began (also in that continent) to show the first stirrings of symbolism. Most likely, the biological underpinnings of symbolic consciousness were exaptively acquired in the radical developmental reorganization that gave rise to the highly characteristic osteological structure of Homo sapiens, but lay fallow for tens of thousands of vears before being discovered by A cultural stimulus, plausibly the invention Of language.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据