期刊
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 8
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 381-404出版社
ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143111
关键词
DSM; nosology; anorexia nervosa; bulimia nervosa; eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS)
Current diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) account for a minority of individuals with clinically significant disorders of eating, raising concerns about the clinical utility of current definitions. This review examines evidence for the validity of current and alternative approaches to defining eating disorders and implications for draft criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Although this review largely supports the predictive validity of distinctions among AN, BN, and the newly proposed binge eating disorder (BED), it also highlights that our tendency to study what we define has created a gap between the problems that people have and what we know about those problems. Future research on the causes and consequences of eating disorders should include more heterogeneous groups to enable identification of meaningful boundaries that distinguish between disorders based on etiological and predictive validity.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据