4.8 Article

Triple gene-deleted oncolytic herpes simplex virus vector double-armed with interleukin 18 and soluble B7-1 constructed by bacterial artificial chromosome-mediated system

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 23, 页码 10663-10668

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2534

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA102139] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS032677] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conditionally replicating herpes simplex virus type I (HSV-1) vectors are promising therapeutic agents for cancer. Certain antitumor functions may be added to oncolytic activities of recombinant HSV-1 vectors by inserting transgenes into the viral genome. Because conventional homologous recombination techniques had required time-consuming processes to create armed oncolytic HSV-1 vectors, we established an innovative construction system using bacterial artificial chromosome and two recombinase systems (Cre/loxP and FLPe/FRT). Using G47 Delta, a safe and efficacious oncolytic HSV-1 with triple gene mutations, as the backbone, this system allowed a rapid generation of multiple vectors with desired transgenes inserted in the deleted ICP6 locus. Four oncolytic HSV-1 vectors, expressing murine interleukin 18 (mIL-18), soluble murine B7-1 [B7-1-immunoglobulin (B7-1-Ig)], both, or none, were created simultaneously within 3 months. In vitro, all newly created recombinant vectors exhibited virus yields and cytopathic effects similar to the parental G47 Delta. In two inummocompetent mouse tumor models, TRAMP-C2 prostate cancer and Neuro2a neuroblastoma, the vector expressing both mIL-18 and B7-1-Ig showed a significant enhancement of antitumor efficacy via T-cell-mediated immune responses. The results show that arming with multiple transgenes can improve the efficacy of oncolytic HSV-1 vectors. The use of our system may facilitate the development and testing of various armed oncolytic HSV-1 vectors. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(23): 10663-8).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据