4.2 Article

Benefits of small-sized caches for scatter-hoarding rodents: Influence of cache size, depth, and soil moisture

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 86, 期 6, 页码 1186-1192

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-016R1.1

关键词

cache fate; cache size; Dipodomys ordii; plant-animal interactions; scatter hoarding

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some granivorous rodents scatter hoard; they bury seeds in shallow pits throughout their territory. These buried caches can represent food stores for the hoarders, food for competitors, or a means of seed dispersal and propagation for plants. Large numbers of seeds may be buried in many caches throughout an area; thus, fate of caches has important consequences for granivores, other animals, and plants. This study examined the ability of Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii) to exploit artificial caches of different sizes, at 2 depths, and in substrates of differing moisture content. Kangaroo rats harvested significantly more caches in moist substrates and at shallower depths; however, small caches containing <= 5 seeds were removed infrequently by individuals regardless of substrate moisture and depth. As cache size was increased in moist sand, a threshold existed at each depth where caches were greatly exploited by kangaroo rats. Results suggest that pilferage of caches under natural conditions is not linear with respect to cache size in moist substrates. As cache size was increased in dry sand, no threshold of increased exploitation was observed for cache sizes used in this experiment. Results also suggest that pilferage of caches under natural conditions is not strongly influenced by size in dry substrates for relatively small caches. Overall, size and depth of caches greatly influence their fate. Perturbations, such as rainfall, also alter detection of caches. To reduce detection of caches by competitors, scatter hoarders should distribute relatively small caches, especially during wet conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据