4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Social disadvantage and adolescent stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 484-492

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.11.126

关键词

race; socioeconomic status; disparities; stress; social disadvantage

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD41527, R01 HD041527, R01 HD041527-03, R01 HD041527-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK59183] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Low socioeconomic status (SES) and minority race/ethnicity are both associated with chronic stress and co-vary in American society. As such, these factors are often used synonymously, without clear theoretical conceptualization of their roles in the development of stress-related health disparities. This Study theorized that race/ethnicity and SES reflect social disadvantage, which is the underlying factor in the development of stress-related illness, and examined how social disadvantage, defined in terms of both race/ethnicity and SES, influences adolescents' stress. Methods: This is a cross-sectional school-based study of 1209 non-Hispanic black and white 7th-12th graders from a single Midwestern metropolitan public school district. Each student completed a questionnaire and a parent provided SES information. Race/ethnicity was obtained from school records. Linear regression analyses determined the influence of race/ethnicity and SES to stress. Race/ethnicity and presence or absence of at least one parent who graduated from college were used to define four subgroups for within-group analyses. Results: Stress was higher among black Students, those from lower SES families, and those with lower perceived SES. In Subgroup analyses, neither race nor SES maintained their independent associations with stress among socially disadvantaged groups. Black race was not associated with stress among those without a college-educated parent, and parent education did not influence stress among black students. In contrast, among more socially advantaged groups, both SES and race explained variation in adolescents' stress. Conclusions: Social disadvantage is associated with increased stress, regardless of whether disadvantage is defined in terms of race or SES. This suggests that race and SES measure adversity in the social environment, and therefore, serve as risk markers, rather than risk factors. Future research should focus on the experience of adversity, which is reflected by these social characteristics, and the processes by which it operates. (c) 2005 Society for Adolescent Medicine. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据