4.5 Article

Usefulness of plasma cardiotrophin-1 in assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy regression in hypertensive patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 2297-2304

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000184406.12634.f9

关键词

cardiotrophin-1; hypertensive heart disease; left ventricular hypertrophy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective We investigated whether regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in response to anti hypertensive treatment is associated with plasma cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) in hypertensive patients. Methods The study was performed in 47 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, and LVH was assessed echocardiographically. The family doctor gave antihypertensive treatment and followed all patients. LVH regression was diagnosed if the baseline left ventricular mass index (LVMI) decreased to normal values after 1 year of treatment. Plasma CT-1 was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results The LVMl was normalized in 23 patients (49%) and persisted at an abnormally increased level in 24 patients (51%) after 1 year of treatment, whereas the reduction in clinic and home blood pressure was similar in the two groups: CT-1 decreased (--48%, P < 0.005) and increased (+35%, P < 0.05) in patients in whom LVH regressed and LVH persisted, respectively. Final values of CT-1 were inversely correlated (r = 0.534, P < 0.001) with the decrease in LVMI after treatment in all patients. A significant association (chi(2) = 16.87, P < 0.001) was found between normalization of CT-1 and regression of LVH with treatment. A cut-off value of 41 fmol/ml for CT-1 provided a relative risk of 43.13 (95% confidence interval, 4.88-380.48) for detecting LVH regression. Conclusion These results show an association between treatment-induced decrease of plasma CT-1 and LVH regression in essential hypertension. Although preliminary, these findings suggest that the determination of plasma CT-1 may be useful for the follow-up of hypertensive heart disease in routine clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据