4.7 Article

Inhibition of RhoA/Rho kinase pathway is involved in the beneficial effect of sildenafil on pulmonary hypertension

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 146, 期 7, 页码 1010-1018

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706408

关键词

Rho proteins; signal transduction; phosphodiesterase; smooth muscle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Inhibition of the type 5 phosphodiesterase and inhibition of Rho kinase are both effective in reducing pulmonary hypertension (PH). Here we investigate whether Rho kinase inhibition is involved in the beneficial effect of the type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil on PH. 2 Chronic hypoxia-induced PH in rats is associated with an increase in RhoA activity in pulmonary artery that was maximal after 2 days (10.7 +/- 0.9-fold increase, n = 6, P < 0.001). The activity of Rho kinase assessed by measuring the level of myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 (MYPT1) phosphorylation was also increased (5.7 +/- 0.8-fold over control, n = 8). 3 Chronic fasudil (30 mg kg(-1)day(-1); 14 days) and sildenafil (25 mg kg(-1)day(-1); 14 days) treatments reduced PH and pulmonary cardiovascular remodelling, and inhibited the MYPT1 phosphorylation in pulmonary artery from hypoxic rats by 82.3 +/- 3% (n = 4) and by 76.6 +/- 2% (n = 4), respectively. 4 The inhibitory effect of sildenafil (10 mu m) on MYPT1 phosphorylation was demonstrated by the loss of actin stress fibres in vascular smooth muscle cells. However, in vitro kinase assays indicated that sildenafil had no direct inhibitory action on Rho kinase activity. 5 Sildenafil treatment induced increased RhoA phosphorylation and association to its cytosolic inhibitory protein, guanine dissociation inhibitor (GDI) in pulmonary artery. 6 We propose that sildenafil inhibits RhoA/Rho kinase-dependent functions in pulmonary artery through enhanced RhoA phosphorylation and cytosolic sequestration by GIN. The inhibition of intracellular events downstream of RhoA thus participates in the beneficial effect of sildenafil on PH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据