4.7 Article

Genetic pleiotropy between asthma and obesity in a community-based sample of twins

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 116, 期 6, 页码 1235-1241

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.016

关键词

asthma; obesity; genetic; twin

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K23 HL072923, K23 HL004231, K23HL04231, K23 HL004231-04, K23HL72923] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [U19AI38429, U19 AI038429] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Asthma and obesity are common conditions that are strongly associated. This association might be due to shared genetic or environmental causes. Objective: We sought to determine whether a shared genetic cause is responsible for the association between asthma and obesity and to estimate the magnitude of shared genetic cause. Methods: The analyses were performed with 1001 monozygotic and 383 dizygotic same-sex twin pairs within the University of Washington Twin Registry. The presence of asthma was determined by self-report of a physician diagnosis of asthma, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated by using self-reported height and weight. Obesity was defined as a BMI of 30 or greater. The association between asthma and BMI was assessed by means of mixed-effects ordinal regression. Twin correlations examined the association of asthma and obesity. Univariate and bivariate structural equation models estimated the components of variance attributable to genetic and environmental effects. Results: A strong association between asthma and BMI was identified in the sample population (P < .001). Substantial heritability was detected for asthma (53%) and obesity (77%), which is indicative of additive genetic influences on each disorder. The best-fitting model of shared components of variance indicated that 8% of the genetic component of obesity is shared with asthma. Conclusion: The covariation between obesity and asthma is predominantly caused by shared genetic risk factors for both conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据