4.6 Article

Coaggregation facilitates interspecies hydrogen transfer between Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 71, 期 12, 页码 7838-7845

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.7838-7845.2005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A thermophilic syntrophic bacterium, Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum strain SI, was grown in a monoculture or coculture with a hydrogenotrophic methanogen, Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus strain Delta H. Microscopic observation revealed that cells of each organism were dispersed in a monoculture independent of the growth substrate. In a coculture, however, these organisms coaggregated to different degrees depending on the substrate; namely, a large fraction of the cells coaggregated when they were grown on propionate, but relatively few cells coaggregated when they were grown on ethanol or I-propanol. Field emission-scanning electron microscopy revealed that flagellum-like filaments of SI cells played a role in making contact with Delta H cells. Microscopic observation of aggregates also showed that extracellular polymeric substance-like structures were present in intercellular spaces. In order to evaluate the importance of coaggregation for syntrophic propionate oxidation, allowable average distances between SI and Delta H cells for accomplishing efficient interspecies hydrogen transfer were calculated by using Fick's diffusion law. The allowable distance for syntrophic propionate oxidation was estimated to be approximately 2 mu m, while the allowable distances for ethanol and propanol oxidation were 16 mu m and 32 mu m, respectively. Considering that the mean cell-to-cell distance in the randomly dispersed culture was approximately 30 mu m (at a concentration in the mid-exponential growth phase of the coculture of 5 X 10(7) cells ml(-1)), it is obvious that close physical contact of these organisms by coaggregation is indispensable for efficient syntrophic propionate oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据