4.3 Article

Phylloplane yeasts from Portugal:: Seven novel anamorphic species in the Tremellales lineage of the Hymenomycetes (Basidiomycota) producing orange-coloured colonies

期刊

FEMS YEAST RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 1167-1183

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.05.007

关键词

Dioszegia; Cryptococcus; phyllosphere; basidiomycetous yeasts; molecular systematics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey of epiphytic yeasts on leaves of selected Mediterranean plant species collected at the 'Arrabida Natural Park' (Portugal) yielded about 850 isolates, mostly of basidiomycetous affinity. Amongst the basidiomycetes, 35 strains showed the following characteristics: production of orange-coloured colonies, ability to produce starch-like compounds, assimilation Of D-glucuronic acid and/ or inositol, inability to utilize nitrate, and formation of ballistoconidia by many of the isolates. This group of yeasts was assigned to the Tremellales lineage of the Hymenomycetes and was further characterised using a combination of conventional phenotypic identification tests with molecular methods, namely PCR fingerprinting and rDNA sequencing. Eight additional strains presumptively identified as Bullera armeniaca, R crocea or Cryptococcus hungaricus were also studied. Twenty-eight strains could be assigned to or were phylogenetically related to recognised species of Dioszegia in the 'Lutcolus clade', but the 15 remaining strains belonged to other clades within the Tremellales. Ten phylloplane isolates were identified as Dioszegia hungarica, one as D. aurantiaca, another as D. crocea and three others were ascribed to the recently described species D.zsoltii. Seven novel species, viz. Cryptococcus anlylolyticus, C armeniacus, C cistialbidi, Dioszegia buhagiarii, D. catarinonii, D. fristingensis and D. takashimae, are proposed for the remaining strains that did not correspond to any of the hitherto recognised species. (c) 2005 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据