4.6 Article

Production of infectious human cytomegalovirus virions is inhibited by drugs that disrupt calcium homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 24, 页码 15388-15397

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.24.15388-15397.2005

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA28379-25, R01 CA028379] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [F32 AI062055-01, F32 AI062055] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously reported that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, resulting in activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Although some normal consequences of UPR activation (e.g., translation attenuation) are detrimental to viral infection, we have previously shown that HCMV infection adapts the UPR to benefit the viral infection (14). For example, UPR-induced translation attenuation is inhibited by viral infection, while potentially beneficial aspects of the UPR are maintained. In the present work, we tested the ability of HCW to overcome a robust induction of the UPR by the drugs thapsigargin and clotrimazole (CLT), which disrupt ER calcium homeostasis. A 24-h treatment with these drugs beginning at 48, 72, or 96 h postinfection (hpi) completely inhibited further production of infectious virions. HCW could not overcome the inhibition of global translation by CLT; however, between 48 and 72 hpi, HCMV overcame translational inhibition caused by thapsigargin. Despite the restoration of translation in thapsigargin, the accumulation of immediate-early and early gene products was modestly retarded (50% or less), whereas the accumulation of an early-late and late gene product was significantly retarded. Electron microscopic analysis shows that the drugs severely disrupt the maturation of HCMV virions. This can be accounted for by both the retarded accumulation of late gene products and the drug-induced depletion of ER calcium, which disrupts critical cellular functions needed for maturation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据