4.7 Article

Involvement of an increased spinal TRPV1 sensitization through its up-regulation in mechanical allodynia of CCI rats

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 977-984

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.05.003

关键词

TRPV1; BCTC; neuropathic pain; allodynia; CCI; rat spinal cord

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1) antagonists are known to attenuate the neuropathic pain symptoms in peripheral nerve injury models, but the mechanism(s) of their effect remains unclear. At the same time, the role of spinal TRPV1 in pain transduction system has not been fully understood. In this study, the role of spinal TRPV1 in mechanical allodynia in rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) model was investigated. Intrathecal administration of a selective TRPV1 antagonist, N-(4-tertiarybutylphenyl)-4-(3-cholorphyridin-2-yl)tetrahydropryazine-1(2H)-carbox-amide (BCTC) significantly attenuated mechanical allodynia in CCI rats at 100 and 300 nmol. In vitro, BCTC inhibited capsaicin (300 nM)-induced releases of calcitonin gene-related peptide-like immunoreactivity (CGRP-LI) and substance P-like immunoreactivity (SP-LI) from the rat spinal cord slice preparations with IC50S of 37.0 and 36.0 nM, respectively, confirming that BCTC potently inhibits TRPV1 function in the rat spinal cord. TRPV1 expression levels in the spinal cord following CCI were quantified in by Western blot analysis. TRPV1 protein levels were significantly increased in the ipsilateral side of the lumbar spinal cord at 7 and 14 days following CCI surgery, but not in the contralateral side. Furthermore, capsaicin (300 nM)-evoked release of CGRP-LI was significantly higher in the ipsilateral spinal cord of CCI rats (14 days after surgery) than that of sham-operated rats. These findings suggest that an increased sensitization of the spinal TRPV1 through its up-regulation is involved in the development and/or maintenance of mechanical allodynia in rat CCI model. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据