4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Biological effects of SLURP-1 on human keratinocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 1236-1241

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23973.x

关键词

apoptosis; gene expression; keratinocytes; monoclonal antibody 3361-112-1A3; recombinant SLURP-1; terminal differentiation

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE14173] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM62136] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel paradigm of keratinocyte (KC) regulation via nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) has been discovered in studies of SLURP (secreted mammalian Ly-6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor-related protein)-1 in Mal de Meleda. We cloned human SLURP-1 and produced recombinant protein and the monoclonal antibody 336H12-1A3 that visualized native SLURP-1. SLURP-1 ligated the conventional ligand-binding site of KC nAChR, showing a higher affinity to the [(3)H]nicotine-, compared with the [3 H]epibatidine-sensitive nAChR. SLURP-1 significantly (p < 0.05) increased the activities of caspases 3 and 8, and the number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling-positive cells. The pro-apoptotic activity of SLURP-1 exceeded that of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, suggesting the involvement of separate pathways. In a series of real-time PCR and in-cell western experiments, SLURP-1 significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated expression of transglutaminase type I cytokeratin 10, p21, and caspase-3. In the presence of the agonist carbachol, the effects of SLURP-1 on gene expression were augmented, which is in keeping with the notion that SLURP-1 acts as an allosteric agonist at the KC nAChR. Thus, the changes in the cell state induced by SLURP-1 could result from nAChR-mediated effects on the KC gene expression. These results suggest that the biological role of SLURP-1 in the epidermis is to provide fine tuning of the physiologic regulation of KC functions through the cholinergic pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据