4.0 Article

Cost-effectiveness of improving primary care treatment of late-life depression

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 62, 期 12, 页码 1313-1320

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1313

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Depression is a leading cause of functional impairment in elderly individuals and is associated with high medical costs, but there are large gaps in quality of treatment in primary care. Objective: To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the Improving Mood Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) collaborative care management program for late-life depression. Design: Randomized controlled trial with recruitment from July 1999 to August 2001. Setting: Eighteen primary care clinics from 8 health care organizations in 5 states. Participants: A total of 1801 patients 60 years or older with major depression (17%), dysthymic disorder (30%), or both (53%). Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to the IMPACT intervention (n = 906) or to usual primary care (n = 895). Intervention patients were provided access to a depression care manager supervised by a psychiatrist and primary care physician. Depression care managers offered education, support of antidepressant medications prescribed in primary care, and problem-solving treatment in primary care (a brief psychotherapy).. Main Outcome Measures: Total outpatient costs, depression-free days, and quality-adjusted life-years. Results: Relative to usual care, intervention patients experienced 107 (95% confidence interval [CI], 86 to 128) more depression-free days over 24 months. Total outpatient costs were $295 (95% Cl, -$525 to $1115) higher during this period. The incremental outpatient cost per depression-free day was $2.76 (95% Cl, -$4.95 to $10.47) and incremental outpatient costs per quality-adjusted life-year ranged from $2519 (951/6 CI, -$4517 to $9554) to $5037 (95% CI, -$9034 to $19 108). Results of a bootstrap analysis suggested a 25% probability that the IMPACT intervention was dominant (ie, lower costs and greater effectiveness). Conclusions: The IMPACT intervention is a high-value investment for older adults; it is associated with high clinical benefits at a low increment in health care costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据