4.6 Article

Nonlinear elasticity in III-N compounds:: Ab initio calculations -: art. no. 245201

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 72, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.245201

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied the nonlinear elasticity effects in zinc-blende and wurtzite crystallographic phases of III-N compounds. Particularly, we have determined the pressure dependences of elastic constants in InN, GaN, and AlN by performing ab initio calculations in the framework of plane-wave pseudopotential implementation of the density-functional theory. The calculations have been performed employing two exchange-correlation functionals, one within the local density approximation and the other within the generalized gradient approximation. We have found that C-11, C-12 in zinc-blende nitrides and C-11, C-12, C-13, C-33 in wurtzite nitrides depend significantly on hydrostatic pressure. Much weaker dependence on pressure has been observed for C-44 elastic constant in both zinc-blende and wurtzite phases. Further, we have examined the influence of pressure dependence of elastic constants on the pressure coefficient of light emission, dE(E)/dP, in wurtzite InGaN/GaN and GaN/AlGaN quantum wells. We have shown that the pressure dependence of elastic constants leads to a significant reduction of dE(E)/dP in nitride quantum wells. Finally, we have considered the influence of nonlinear elasticity of III-N compounds on the properties of hexagonal nitride quantum dots (QDs). For typical wurtzite GaN/AlN QDs, we have shown that taking into account pressure dependence of elastic constants results in the decrease of volumetric strain in the QD region by about 7%. Simultaneously, the average z component of the piezoelectric polarization in the QDs increases by 0.1 MV/cm compared to the case when linear elastic theory is used. Both effects, i.e., decrease of volumetric strain as well as increase of piezoelectric field, decrease the band-to-band transition energies in the QDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据