4.5 Article

Should bleeding tendency deter abdominal paracentesis?

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 946-951

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.07.009

关键词

abdominal paracentesis; emergency; platelet count; prothrombin time; ultrasound

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims. This study was conducted to evaluate the complications and bleeding associated with either thrombocytopoenia or prolongation of prothrombin time for ultrasound-guided abdominal paracentesis in the emergency department. Study design and patients. In an emergency department of a tertiary centre, patients receiving ultrasound-guided abdominal paracentesis by the emergency physicians were prospectively enrolled. Patient characteristics, the preprocedure international normalised ratio for prothrombin time and the platelet count, and the procedure-related complications were collected and analysed. Results. For a 2-year study period, a total of 410 abdominal paracenteses in 163 patients were investigated. The preprocedure international normalised ratio for prothrombin time was more than 1.5 in 142 paracenteses; the preprocedure platelet count was less than 50 x 10(3) mu L-1 in 55 paracenteses. Only two out of 4 10 procedures (0.5%, 95% confidence interval = 0.1-1.8%) were associated with minor complications of cutaneous bleeding in the same patient (0.6%, 95% confidence interval = 0.1-3.4%) at different visits. There was no significant procedure-related bleeding or complications even in patients with marked thrombocytopoenia or prolongation in international normalised ratio. Conclusions. Bleeding complication of ultrasound-guided abdominal paracentesis is uncommon and appears to be very mild, regardless of preprocedure international normalised ratio or platelet count. Routine correction of prolonged international normalised ratio or thrombocytopoenia before abdominal paracentesis may not be necessary. (C) 2005 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据